Multilateral salvation fund after its country program evaluation in 1999.Īmt. Health, environment, road infrastructure, energy, local government reform, and a Had not demonstrated the selectivity, it selected the following sectors as priority sectors: Thus, Denmark intensified the selectivity. The percentage increased to 89.2% during the term In total, the three sectors receivedĦ7.4% of the total during the term. Second and third largest percentages of its assistance. The transportation/communication and agriculture sectors received the The allocation to these sectors amounted to 71.1% of the total assistance.ĭenmark allocated the largest percentage of its assistance to the health sector during the Table 3.2.b Sectoral Commitments by Eight Major Bilateral Donors, 1996-97įor example, the United Kingdom allocated a large percentage of its assistance to theĪgriculture sector as well as the distribution/tourism sector during the terms 1992-95 andġ996-97. Table 3.2.a Sectoral Commitments by Eight Major Bilateral Donors, 1992-97 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan's ODA, various issues. OECD (DAC), Development Cooperation Report, various issues. Other bilateral donors decreased the number of sectors they were supporting in 1992-95 Japan provided assistance to many sectors, such as the economic infrastructure,Īgriculture, energy, water supply, and health, during the terms 1992-97, Tables 3.2.a and 3.2.b show the sectoral distribution of bilateral donor assistance. Table 3.1 Assistance to Tanzania in the Past Ten Years Japan remained the top donor from the mid-nineties. Table 3.1 shows that there was no increase in either bilateral or multilateral assistance to The main donors for Tanzania are Japan, Scandinavian countries, the United Kingdom, The country’s rank was the third for assistanceįrom Finland, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Tanzania was the top or second recipient for bilateral assistance in 1987-98įrom Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Largest net ODA disbursements in real terms from 1987-88, and its rank was second only Tanzania was one of the largest recipients of ODA in Africa. This region’s share of the ODA of all developing countries fell from 31.3 percent in 1995 The net receipts of sub-Saharan African countries declined by 15.8 percent for this period. Period, with its shares in DAC members at 21.2 percent in 1995 and 21.6 percent in Those from Japan also followed this trend during the same The net receipts of the ODA of all developing countries from 1995 to 1999 increased 3.1 Changes in the Environment of Donor Assistance to Tanzania
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |